In Nosy Be, the case of the "Ampasikely I and II" plots in Dzamandzar commune raises questions about the transparency of land administration. Gilles Daheron is waging a legal battle to assert his rights over investments he claims to have been dispossessed of in favor of new operators. On Monday, September 14, at IKM Antsahavola, accompanied by his lawyer, Me Ruffin Nantenaina Vitta, he presented at a press conference a series of administrative and commercial acts he believes are at the origin of this situation. The case dates back to 2004, when Daheron filed requests no. 6866-NB and no. 6960 for the lease of two plots totaling 45 ares 11.8 ca. A domain recognition was established in October 2004, followed by an agreement setting the fee in 2008 and, in 2019, a favorable opinion for granting a 50-year emphyteutic lease. Meanwhile, he created, in 2007, the company "Les Résidences d'Ampasikely", obtained building permits for bungalows, a restaurant and a swimming pool, then authorization to open the establishment in 2009. A report confirming development was also established in his favor in July 2016. Irregularities and administrative favoritism. In 2016, the business was transferred to the Lagrue couple, then in 2020 to new operators, under the name "Moya Beach". According to documents presented by the defense, the transfer deeds and commercial lease continued to recognize the properties and infrastructure as falling under Gilles Daheron's rights. However, in May 2022, decision no. 004/22-MATSF rejected his request, notably for "lack of development" and "disinterest", linked to non-payment of fees. The defense contests these grounds, noting that investments and the 2016 development report demonstrate the opposite. A month later, on June 16, 2022, a new development report was established in favor of the opposing party. According to Daheron and his lawyer, this document largely reproduces the previous report established in 2016. In November 2022, two emphyteutic leases, no. 8025-BO and no. 8024-BO, were finally issued to the new beneficiary. The defense thus denounces a confusion between the transfer of a business and the transfer of real estate rights, as well as practices it qualifies as favoritism and use of forged documents. Absurd criminal conviction. The case takes another turn in 2024. Gilles Daheron is convicted of fraud by the Antsiranana court of appeal in its judgment no. 537 of December 10, 2024. In his defense, this conviction is paradoxical, as it occurs while Daheron claims to have sought to assert his rights and obtain payment of rent on the infrastructure he claims as his own. An appeal in the interest of the law was filed on August 5, 2026. Beyond Gilles Daheron's personal case, this matter raises a broader question: what is the point of investing, building and following administrative procedures if, at the end of the process, claimed rights can be awarded to another beneficiary?