Five customs agents are being questioned in an investigation into an attempted smuggling of approximately six kilograms of gold at Ivato airport. The customs authority says it is determined to shed full light on any potential responsibilities.

Antoine Randrianjafy, director general of customs, confirmed the information during a statement at Antaninarenina. The investigation into the seizure of around six kilograms of gold at Ivato international airport has entered a new phase with the opening of an inquiry targeting five customs agents.

They have been questioned since yesterday as part of this investigation. The inquiries are intended to establish the circumstances under which this significant quantity of gold was transported to the airport and to identify any potential responsibilities in the matter. At this stage, their involvement in the investigation does not allow for conclusions about their guilt. It is up to the investigations and, if necessary, the courts to determine individual responsibilities.

The director general of customs stated that his administration does not intend to protect agents who failed in their obligations. He assured that employees who do not respect the law or who may be involved in corrupt practices receive no protection from the administration. This position comes as customs undergoes reform and renewal.

The case underscores the role of agents responsible for inspecting goods and travelers at borders. Customs work extends beyond formalities related to travel. Airport inspections also serve to protect state interests and combat illegal resource exports. In this context, agent integrity and procedural compliance are essential to maintaining public confidence.

The gold seizure was reportedly achieved through collaboration between the presidency and customs. A woman preparing to leave the country with this cargo had already boarded an aircraft destined for Nairobi, with onward travel to Dar es-Salaam.

Head of State Colonel Michaël Randrianirina visited the site to monitor developments, displaying firm resolve on such matters. This intervention reflects the authorities' commitment to monitoring resource movements leaving the territory.

The investigation continues. The customs director general calls for allowing investigators and the courts to do their work. The objective remains to establish facts without drawing conclusions before the procedure concludes.

Beyond the quantity of gold seized, this case raises questions about public officials' responsibility in exercising their duties. The transparency of the investigation and respect for judicial procedures will be crucial to fully clarifying this matter and preserving citizen confidence in border control services.